The years-long deception maintained by highest-level US officials has been put to rest, though not for the sake of justice and democracy

Be real: It is not hard to see that America - as it really exists, not the 'dream' version - is neither a democracy nor a country with genuine rule of law. That's because democracy worth the label is impossible, for starters, with elections awash in private moneyand a bizarre Electoral Collegemaking sure that Americans do not, actually, have votes of even numerically equal weight when electing their single most powerful official, the president.

The rule of law can only exist where citizens are equal before laws that apply to everyone in the same, just manner. This is a challenge everywhere, but the US is an almost comically egregious case of legal bias, obscurantism (masquerading as limitlessly re-interpretable case law), and inequality by status, wealth, ethnicity, and skin color. Just ask thatcrackhead, porn addict, and shady "businessman"from an infamous clan, who is currently not in prison but giving expletive-laden interviews instead.

The US, simply put, does not operate the way it claims to operate. It takes an extraordinary amount of naivete - on the scale of believing in Santa Claus or an honest Vladimir Zelensky - not to notice that much. What is more difficult to figure out is how politics and power actually do work in America and, most of all, who is really in charge. We have, for example, recently witnessed a presidency in which a severely senescent Joe Biden claimed to be but clearlycould not bein command. So, who was? And who is in general?

That, ultimately, is perhaps the single most disturbing question raised by recent developments around the rotting corpse of "Russiagate" (aka Russia Rage). In its heyday - between 2016 and about 2020 - "Russiagate" was the shorthand for a conspiracy theory that dominated US politics and mainstream media, causing mass hysteria. Its details were exceedingly complicated but its core was extremely simple: the claims that Russia had manipulated the American presidential elections of 2016, that it had done so to facilitate the first victory of Donald Trump, and finally that Donald Trump's team had colluded with Russia.

The power of this preponderantly factually false and entirely misleading narrative was such that it overshadowed much of Donald Trump's first presidency and contributed greatly to a catastrophic and very dangerous decline in the always challenging relationship with Russia. Indeed, there even is a plausible connection to be made between the mass madness of "Russiagate" and the reckless policy of provoking and waging a proxy war against Russia in Ukraine.

"Russiagate," in other words, did not only harm the US; it harmed the whole world. In that respect, think of it as the political equivalent of the 2008 US banking crisis: the mess was American, the fallout global.

Now, Trump is back for a second term and bent on revenge against his detractors not only but especially over "Russiagate." In his usual refreshingly candid style,he has announced that"it is time to go after people," fingered former president Barrack Obama for "treason," and gleefully shared an AI-generated video showing Obama being arrested in the White House.

Just before that typical Trump outburst, his Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, releaseda freshly declassified report- produced in early 2017 by the intelligence committee of the House of Representatives - that addresses what really happened in 2016 when "Russiagate" was initially invented.

This release was clearly meant to be a sensation: Gabbard accompanied it withpress statementsand a detailed thread ofX postsbringing out its most explosive aspects. Among them, the key finding is that Russia did not work to make Trump president. Boom: the basis of "Russiagate" gone, just like that.

And who was to blame? Gabbard made clear that "Russiagate" was not a cluster-fiasco born of mere incompetence but a monster intentionally produced and carefully nurtured. She accused "top national security officials," including FBI Director James Comey, CIA Director John Brennan, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper as well as Obama himself of deliberately creating and spreading the impression of Russian election meddling in favor of Trump bymanipulating the actual, contradictory findings of the intelligence agencies.

Gabbard used strong language: a "coup" against Trump, the "weaponization of intelligence," a "treasonous conspiracy," and a "betrayal concerning every American." Those mainstream media, such as the New York Times, that are among the worst offenders in spreading the "Russiagate" hoax have already pounced on this language to, in essence, pooh-pooing Gabbard's chargesas hyperbolical.

Don't fall for that deflection. Gabbard's way of presenting her case does have a political edge. Of course it does. Duh. And if they wish, the old "Russiagaters" can nitpick over her terms to their heart's content. But that makes no difference to the fact that what has happened is an enormous blight on US politics, implicating the intelligence services as well as other state agencies, the media, and, indeed, former President Obama. Gabbard may be laying it on a little thick (or not, actually), but even without any embellishment, the fabrication of "Russiagate" was the real, humungous scandal. And it must be dealt with at long last.

Dealing with it is where several measures already taken point: AJustice Department "strike force"has been set up; the current CIA director John Ratcliffe has, in essence, denounced his predecessor John Brennan to the FBI; and the current FBI director Kash Patel has opened an investigation into his predecessor James Comey. The knives are out. Or so it seems.

It is always satisfying to see a big fat lie punctured and deflated. But there is, unfortunately, little reason to celebrate. For one thing, it is unlikely that many of those who concocted and spread "Russiagate" will actually face real consequences. That is just not how the US works: its "elites" have a record of impunity only rivaled by those of Israel. Obama, in particular, is certain to be safe: Ironically, he is now protected by the sameextraordinary legal privilegethat the Supreme Court has conjured up for Trump.

And where one team of manipulators has lost its grip, another one is already showing its mettle. Because in one respect even the New York Timeshas a point: one reason for at least the timing of escalation in Trump's revenge campaign is that it is meant to distract us from that other horrific scandal, associated with the name of convicted pedophile, suspected intelligence agent and blackmailer, and very, very dubious suicide victim Jeffrey Epstein. The same Trump officials now in high dudgeon over "Russiagate," have shown no independence of mind, professionalism, or commitment to truth and the public welfare, when helping Trump evade full transparency for the Epstein files,in which his name also appears.

Finally, even while revealing that "Russiagate" was a hoax, Gabbard - and the House intelligence report she had declassified - still tried to blame Moscow. It's a tricky operation: Now, we are supposed to stop accusing Russia and its President Vladimir Putin of helping Trump - and Trump of profiting from such help - but we are still asked to believe that they had nothing better to do than "undermine faith in the US democratic process."

Where to even begin? There is no democratic process in the plutocratic US. Even aPrinceton University studyhas long acknowledged that America is not a democracy. In reality, there only is an obstinate and, frankly, brazen pretense of such a process; and maybe some people still believe in it. But it really does not take Russia or any other outside forces to make sure that many do not. That loss of faith in a thing that isn't there is entirely made in America.

Maybe one day, America's establishment - of all flavors - will learn to stop childishly blaming others, be it their predecessors (who usually deserve it) or foreigners (who often don't deserve it) and face its very own responsibility. But I would not bet on it. Cowardice, careerism, and hypocrisy run too deep. Most likely, there will never be true justice. Only tit-for-tat retaliation. On the other hand, if that's the only thing on offer, bring it on: I, for one, will take it.

(RT.com)